Recently came across this very interesting initiative: Tribunal 12
Inspired by the International War Crimes Tribunal that was formed by Bertrand Russell and Jean-Paul Sartre in 1967, Tribunal 12 sets out to locate the moral, legal and political responsibilities as well as call for a change within the European asylum, migration and border system.
Tribunal 12 advocates a change within the European system that currently treats people who flee to Europe disrespectfully and exposes them to systematic violations.
In order to achieve this, Tribunal 12 sets out to make visible what refugees, asylum seekers and migrants are experiencing in their encounter with Europe and:
- Investigate whether human rights are violated.
- Expose the hidden structures that allow for the inhumane treatment of refugees, asylum seekers and migrants.
- Locate the moral, legal and political responsibility for the current situation in Europe.
THE TRIBUNAL SESSIONS
Tribunal 12 will present four sessions focusing on: border control, the asylum process, undocumented migrants, and detention & deportation. Each session is introduced and led by a prosecutor who will present evidence that may consist of witness statements, expert presentations, statistics, reports and stories. Artistic expressions will form an integral part of the tribunal and the sessions will have a dramaturgical framework. Members of the jury are internationally acclaimed persons active within the fields of philosophy, international law, literature, arts and activism:
Nawal El Saadawi, Saskia Sassen, Nuruddin Farah, Sadik J. Al-Azm, Henning Mankell, Parvin Ardalan, B.S. Chimni
Date: 12 May, 2012
Location: Sergels torg & Kulturhuset in Stockholm and all over Europe.
More info, a call for evidence, flyers can be found on www.tribunal12.org
The Nov 12 issue of The Economist featured an interesting article on international marriages (“Herr and Madame, Senor and Mrs”) which seems timely as many governments around the world are imposing/maintaining restrictions on family migration and family reunification, arguing, for example, that cross-border marriages destabilise their societies (or ethnic homogeneity), that they are often exploitative (e.g. between an older richer man and a younger woman from a poor country) and should thus be prevented, or that there is a high risk of ‘sham marriages’ for the sole purpose of gaining legal status for the ‘foreign’ spouse.
Drawing particularly on research and sources in Asia and Europe, the article discusses global trends and local phenomena around marriages involving partners of different nationalities.
Some key insights the article presents are:
The article goes on discussing the controversial nature of marriages “between girls from poor countries and older men from rich ones”